On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:27:45PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:21:12AM +0000, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> > Some of the DRM_NOTE messages are just using "uC" without specifying
> > which uc they are related to. We can be more user friendly.
> >
> > v2: moved to the header (Joonas)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hi...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c | 6 ++++--
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> > index c767dc3..e259cae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.c
> > @@ -182,10 +182,12 @@ static void fetch_uc_fw(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,
> > }
> >
> > if (uc_fw->major_ver_wanted == 0 && uc_fw->minor_ver_wanted == 0) {
> > - DRM_NOTE("Skipping uC firmware version check\n");
> > + DRM_NOTE("Skipping %s firmware version check\n",
> > + intel_uc_fw_type_repr(uc_fw->type));
> > } else if (uc_fw->major_ver_found != uc_fw->major_ver_wanted ||
> > uc_fw->minor_ver_found < uc_fw->minor_ver_wanted) {
> > - DRM_NOTE("uC firmware version %d.%d, required %d.%d\n",
> > + DRM_NOTE("%s firmware version %d.%d, required %d.%d\n",
> > + intel_uc_fw_type_repr(uc_fw->type),
> > uc_fw->major_ver_found, uc_fw->minor_ver_found,
> > uc_fw->major_ver_wanted, uc_fw->minor_ver_wanted);
> > err = -ENOEXEC;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> > index f524387..7139e31 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uc.h
> > @@ -125,6 +125,20 @@ enum intel_uc_fw_type {
> > INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_HUC
> > };
> >
> > +/* User-friendly representation of an enum */
> > +static inline const char *intel_uc_fw_type_repr(enum intel_uc_fw_type type)
> > +{
> > + switch (type) {
> > + case INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC:
> > + return "GuC";
> > + case INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_HUC:
> > + return "HuC";
> > + default:
> > + MISSING_CASE(type);
> > + return "<invalid>";
> > + }
>
> Do we want to write these (when we have a clear enum type):
>
> switch (type) {
> case INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC: return "GuC";
> case INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_HUC: return "HuC";
> }
>
> MISSING_CASE(type);
> return "uC";
>
> The hope being that the compiler will give us a warning before we
> encounter the runtime WARN.
I was already proposing this option to rely on compiler, but there
was a single nack from Anusha, now overbid ;)
-Michal
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
