On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 01:02:52PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On to, 2017-03-30 at 09:53 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Since commit 1233e2db199d ("drm/i915: Move object backing storage
> > manipulation to its own locking"), i915_gem_object_put_pages() and
> > specifically the i915_gem_gtt_finish_pages() may be called from outside
> > of the struct_mutex and so we can no longer pass I915_WAIT_LOCKED to
> > i915_gem_wait_for_idle.
> >
> > Fixes: 1233e2db199d ("drm/i915: Move object backing storage manipulation to
> > its own locking")
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10+
>
> Is there Bugzilla or did you just hit the assert on your own?
Just reviewing callers of i915_gem_wait_for_idle() prior to refactor.
Seems like we got the message across about not using Ironlake + VT'd, or
that those that do are using enterprise kernels and won't have lockdep
enabled when they finally get the kernel update in a few years time.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
