On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:06:20PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:58:20AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:55:06AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > guc_addon_create() makes the assumption that it need only kmap the > > > initial page in order to write all of the configuration data used by the > > > guc. Confusingly it also allocates many scratch pages in the same vma > > > and passes that to the guc. Reassure the reader that all is well with a > > > BUILD_BUG_ON() that we do not access outside of the kmapped page. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > > Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com> > > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> > > > Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.ma...@intel.com> > > > Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c | 5 +++++ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 1 + > > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c > > > index 97726fcb1230..91d7ab0df0cd 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c > > > @@ -888,13 +888,16 @@ static void guc_addon_create(struct intel_guc *guc) > > > guc->ads_vma = vma; > > > } > > > > > > + /* First members are assumed to be in a single page */ > > > > s/First/Written/ > > Btw, maybe it would be better to move all these BUILD_BUGs here?
I was thinking next to the write so that if they were changed, copied, it would be more obvious to update; as well as the check being clearly associated with the write. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
