From: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gu...@intel.com>

Considering how we don't currently give userspace control over the
OA buffer size and always configure a large 16MB buffer,
then a buffer overflow does anyway likely indicate that something
has gone quite badly wrong.

Here we set a status flag to detect overflow and inform userspace
of the report_lost condition accordingly. This is in line with the
behavior of the periodic OA buffer.

Signed-off-by: Sourab Gupta <sourab.gu...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index d0f43e9..0f2a552 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2609,6 +2609,8 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
                struct {
                        struct i915_vma *vma;
                        u8 *vaddr;
+#define I915_PERF_CMD_STREAM_BUF_STATUS_OVERFLOW (1<<0)
+                       u32 status;
                } command_stream_buf;
 
                struct list_head cs_samples;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
index d1d9853..2841d0a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
@@ -478,6 +478,8 @@ static void insert_perf_sample(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv,
                else {
                        u32 target_size = sample_size - first->offset;
 
+                       dev_priv->perf.command_stream_buf.status |=
+                               I915_PERF_CMD_STREAM_BUF_STATUS_OVERFLOW;
                        release_perf_samples(dev_priv, target_size);
                        sample->offset = 0;
                }
@@ -491,6 +493,8 @@ static void insert_perf_sample(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv,
                                (first->offset - last->offset -
                                sample_size);
 
+                       dev_priv->perf.command_stream_buf.status |=
+                               I915_PERF_CMD_STREAM_BUF_STATUS_OVERFLOW;
                        release_perf_samples(dev_priv, target_size);
                        sample->offset = last->offset + sample_size;
                }
@@ -1577,6 +1581,17 @@ static int oa_rcs_append_reports(struct i915_perf_stream 
*stream,
        struct i915_perf_cs_sample *entry, *next;
        LIST_HEAD(free_list);
        int ret = 0;
+       u32 status = dev_priv->perf.command_stream_buf.status;
+
+       if (unlikely(status & I915_PERF_CMD_STREAM_BUF_STATUS_OVERFLOW)) {
+               ret = append_oa_status(stream, buf, count, offset,
+                                      DRM_I915_PERF_RECORD_OA_BUFFER_LOST);
+               if (ret)
+                       return ret;
+
+               dev_priv->perf.command_stream_buf.status &=
+                               ~I915_PERF_CMD_STREAM_BUF_STATUS_OVERFLOW;
+       }
 
        spin_lock(&dev_priv->perf.sample_lock);
        if (list_empty(&dev_priv->perf.cs_samples)) {
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to