On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:17:25AM +0530, Kamble, Sagar A wrote: > LGTM. > Reviewed-by: Sagar Arun Kamble [1]<sagar.a.kam...@intel.com> > > PS: Might need updating comments in the guc_interrupts_capture to align with > new name and semantics of this bit > w.r.t pm_intrmsk_mbz.
I felt the comment was still correct. It only talks about REDIRECT_TO_GUC and describes it as an inverted disable bit - so still seems apt for DISABLE_REDIRECT_TO_GUC. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
