From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
It is always called from thread context.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 1fd4128a10b1..b7ec6636e2a0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -4086,7 +4086,6 @@ __i915_request_irq_complete(const struct
drm_i915_gem_request *req)
if (engine->irq_seqno_barrier &&
test_and_clear_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted)) {
struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs;
- unsigned long flags;
/* The ordering of irq_posted versus applying the barrier
* is crucial. The clearing of the current irq_posted must
@@ -4108,7 +4107,7 @@ __i915_request_irq_complete(const struct
drm_i915_gem_request *req)
* the seqno before we believe it coherent since they see
* irq_posted == false but we are still running).
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave(&b->irq_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irq(&b->irq_lock);
if (b->irq_wait && b->irq_wait->tsk != current)
/* Note that if the bottom-half is changed as we
* are sending the wake-up, the new bottom-half will
@@ -4117,7 +4116,7 @@ __i915_request_irq_complete(const struct
drm_i915_gem_request *req)
* ourself.
*/
wake_up_process(b->irq_wait->tsk);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->irq_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&b->irq_lock);
if (__i915_gem_request_completed(req, seqno))
return true;
--
2.9.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
