Dear Daniel,
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2012, 10:07 +0200 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > We already correctly ignore bit0 on gen < 4, now we also now why ;-) s,also now,also know, Maybe also do not use abbreviations in commit summaries. > I've decided that losing that single bit of precision isn't worth the > trouble to sprinkle IS_PINEVIEW checks all over the backlight control > code - that code is way too fragile imo. > > Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > index 7dcc04f..20244b9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h > @@ -1828,6 +1828,8 @@ > */ > #define BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_SHIFT (0) > #define BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_MASK (0xffff) > +#define BACKLIGHT_DUTY_CYCLE_MASK_PNV (0xfffe) > +#define BLM_POLARITY_PNV (1 << 0) /* pnv only */ > > #define BLC_HIST_CTL 0x61260 Thanks, Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
