On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 06:46:41PM +0530, deepa...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Deepak S <deepa...@linux.intel.com>
> 
> With latest Punit FW, vgg input voltag drop falling to minimum is fixed.
> So reverting the WA patch & moving to turbo freq opreation range to [RPn -> 
> RP0]
> 
> This is not a 1:1 revert of the commit 
> 5b7c91b78b1ce6663e0f1f037f6cb4d7c9537d44.
> You can refer to commit 5b5929cbe3f7 ("drm/i915/chv: remove
> pre-production hardware workarounds") as the reason for the discrepancy
> 
> commit 5b7c91b78b1ce6663e0f1f037f6cb4d7c9537d44
> Author: Deepak S <deepa...@linux.intel.com>
> Date:   Sat May 9 18:15:46 2015 +0530
> 
>     drm/i915/chv: Set min freq to efficient frequency on chv
> 
> v2: Fix inconsistent return type. (Chris)
> v3: drop pre-production hw case (Ville)
> 
> Acked-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepa...@linux.intel.com>

I was never able to reproduce the supposed Punit problems with <RPe
frequencies. In fact what I always observed was that the voltage did end
up lower at RPn than at RPe. IIRC it might have been lower even while
we were in RC6. I can't actually double check that right now since they
made SVID inaccessible via sideband on CHV and I'm too lazy to set up
the extra equipment for it now.

What I can say is that RAPL is reporting ~10 mW lower power consumption
with vsynced glxgears running when we're running at 200 MHz rather than
at 400 MHz. So I'm going to decalare this patch good.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
and pushed to dinq. Thanks for the patch.

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 81ab119..fa80881 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -5579,6 +5579,17 @@ static int cherryview_rps_guar_freq(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       return rp1;
>  }
>  
> +static u32 cherryview_rps_min_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +     u32 val, rpn;
> +
> +     val = vlv_punit_read(dev_priv, FB_GFX_FMIN_AT_VMIN_FUSE);
> +     rpn = ((val >> FB_GFX_FMIN_AT_VMIN_FUSE_SHIFT) &
> +                    FB_GFX_FREQ_FUSE_MASK);
> +
> +     return rpn;
> +}
> +
>  static int valleyview_rps_guar_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  {
>       u32 val, rp1;
> @@ -5818,8 +5829,7 @@ static void cherryview_init_gt_powersave(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>                        intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, dev_priv->rps.rp1_freq),
>                        dev_priv->rps.rp1_freq);
>  
> -     /* PUnit validated range is only [RPe, RP0] */
> -     dev_priv->rps.min_freq = dev_priv->rps.efficient_freq;
> +     dev_priv->rps.min_freq = cherryview_rps_min_freq(dev_priv);
>       DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("min GPU freq: %d MHz (%u)\n",
>                        intel_gpu_freq(dev_priv, dev_priv->rps.min_freq),
>                        dev_priv->rps.min_freq);
> -- 
> 1.9.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to