On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 21:44 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Rename the function, move it at the top, and reuse in
> intel_dp_link_rate_index(). If there was a reason in the past to use
> reverse search order here, there isn't now.
> 
> Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.nav...@intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 33 ++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 1d66737a3a0f..f3068ff670a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -266,6 +266,17 @@ static int intersect_rates(const int *source_rates, int 
> source_len,
>       return k;
>  }
>  
> +static int intel_dp_find_rate(const int *rates, int len, int rate)

I wonder if the function name can be more intuitive. The argument is
rate and the function name indicates it also returns rate. I can't tell
what the function does by it's name. Feel free to ignore this comment as
I might be missing some context.

-DK

> +{
> +     int i;
> +
> +     for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> +             if (rate == rates[i])
> +                     return i;
> +
> +     return -1;
> +}
> +
>  static int intel_dp_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>                                int *common_rates)
>  {
> @@ -284,15 +295,10 @@ static int intel_dp_link_rate_index(struct intel_dp 
> *intel_dp,
>                                   int *common_rates, int link_rate)
>  {
>       int common_len;
> -     int index;
>  
>       common_len = intel_dp_common_rates(intel_dp, common_rates);
> -     for (index = 0; index < common_len; index++) {
> -             if (link_rate == common_rates[common_len - index - 1])
> -                     return common_len - index - 1;
> -     }
>  
> -     return -1;
> +     return intel_dp_find_rate(common_rates, common_len, link_rate);
>  }
>  
>  int intel_dp_get_link_train_fallback_values(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> @@ -1542,17 +1548,6 @@ bool intel_dp_read_desc(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>       return true;
>  }
>  
> -static int rate_to_index(const int *rates, int len, int rate)
> -{
> -     int i;
> -
> -     for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> -             if (rate == rates[i])
> -                     return i;
> -
> -     return -1;
> -}
> -
>  int
>  intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  {
> @@ -1568,8 +1563,8 @@ intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  
>  int intel_dp_rate_select(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int rate)
>  {
> -     int i = rate_to_index(intel_dp->sink_rates, intel_dp->num_sink_rates,
> -                           rate);
> +     int i = intel_dp_find_rate(intel_dp->sink_rates,
> +                                intel_dp->num_sink_rates, rate);
>  
>       if (WARN_ON(i < 0))
>               i = 0;

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to