> -----Original Message----- > From: Jani Nikula [mailto:jani.nik...@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 12:31 PM > To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.com>; Anand, > Jerome <jerome.an...@intel.com>; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; alsa- > de...@alsa-project.org > Cc: ti...@suse.de; broo...@kernel.org; Ughreja, Rakesh A > <rakesh.a.ughr...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v4 2/5] drm/i915: Add support for audio driver > notifications > > On Mon, 23 Jan 2017, Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre- > louis.boss...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >>> #include <drm/drmP.h> > >>> @@ -630,6 +631,10 @@ void intel_audio_codec_enable(struct > intel_encoder *intel_encoder, > >>> if (acomp && acomp->audio_ops && acomp->audio_ops- > >pin_eld_notify) > >>> acomp->audio_ops->pin_eld_notify(acomp->audio_ops- > >audio_ptr, > >>> (int) port, (int) pipe); > >>> + > >>> + if (HAS_LPE_AUDIO(dev_priv)) > >>> + intel_lpe_audio_notify(dev_priv, connector->eld, port, > >>> + crtc_state->port_clock); > >> > >> Seems unnecessary to check for HAS_LPE_AUDIO (which you'll change to > >> dev_priv->lpe_audio.platdev, right ;) both in the caller and callee. > >> Pick one. > > > > If we test inside of the function, it'd mean an unconditional jump to > > test a feature that exists on only two platforms out of the dozen or > > so that this i915 driver handles. No objection to do the change but is > > this really desired? > > *shrug* no big deal to check in both. >
Thanks for the ack Jani. It was added based on one review comment. I'll remove it here and have the check only inside the API > BR, > Jani. > > > > > > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
