> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart [mailto:pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 7, 2017 2:10 AM
> To: Anand, Jerome <jerome.an...@intel.com>; intel-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org; alsa-de...@alsa-project.org
> Cc: ti...@suse.de; broo...@kernel.org; Ughreja, Rakesh A
> <rakesh.a.ughr...@intel.com>; ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH V2 5/7] ALSA: x86: hdmi: Improve position
> reporting
> 
> On 1/6/17 7:21 PM, Jerome Anand wrote:
> > Use a hw register to calculate sub-period position reports.
> > This makes PulseAudio happier.
> 
>  From Takashi: There is no big merit to keep this a separate patch.
> Please fold into the main patch. You can put some comment in the code for
> explanation.
> 

Misread the final comments. Thought we will be having it as separate patches 
only
Do you still think we can merge these changes to the main file ?

> 
> 
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Henningsson <david.hennings...@canonical.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.boss...@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Anand <jerome.an...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  sound/x86/intel_hdmi_audio.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/x86/intel_hdmi_audio.c
> b/sound/x86/intel_hdmi_audio.c
> > index d7b57658..d2036bc 100644
> > --- a/sound/x86/intel_hdmi_audio.c
> > +++ b/sound/x86/intel_hdmi_audio.c
> > @@ -1489,6 +1489,8 @@ static snd_pcm_uframes_t
> snd_intelhad_pcm_pointer(
> >  {
> >     struct snd_intelhad *intelhaddata;
> >     u32 bytes_rendered = 0;
> > +   u32 t;
> > +   int buf_id;
> >
> >     /* pr_debug("snd_intelhad_pcm_pointer called\n"); */
> >
> > @@ -1499,6 +1501,14 @@ static snd_pcm_uframes_t
> snd_intelhad_pcm_pointer(
> >             return SNDRV_PCM_POS_XRUN;
> >     }
> >
> > +   buf_id = intelhaddata->curr_buf % 4;
> > +   had_read_register(AUD_BUF_A_LENGTH + (buf_id *
> HAD_REG_WIDTH), &t);
> > +   if (t == 0) {
> > +           pr_debug("discovered buffer done for buf %d\n", buf_id);
> > +           /* had_process_buffer_done(intelhaddata); */
> > +   }
> > +   t = intelhaddata->buf_info[buf_id].buf_size - t;
> > +
> >     if (intelhaddata->stream_info.buffer_rendered)
> >             div_u64_rem(intelhaddata->stream_info.buffer_rendered,
> >                     intelhaddata->stream_info.ring_buf_size,
> > @@ -1506,7 +1516,7 @@ static snd_pcm_uframes_t
> snd_intelhad_pcm_pointer(
> >
> >     intelhaddata->stream_info.buffer_ptr = bytes_to_frames(
> >                                             substream->runtime,
> > -                                           bytes_rendered);
> > +                                           bytes_rendered + t);
> >     return intelhaddata->stream_info.buffer_ptr;
> >  }
> >
> >

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to