Since commit fe115628d567 ("drm/i915: Implement pwrite without
struct-mutex") the lowlevel pwrite calls are now called without the
protection of struct_mutex, but pwrite_phys was still asserting that it
held the struct_mutex and later tried to drop and relock it.

Fixes: fe115628d567 ("drm/i915: Implement pwrite without struct-mutex")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <drm-intel-fi...@lists.freedesktop.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 34 ++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 2957c96eb93d..e5b4a72645d4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -597,47 +597,21 @@ i915_gem_phys_pwrite(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
                     struct drm_i915_gem_pwrite *args,
                     struct drm_file *file)
 {
-       struct drm_device *dev = obj->base.dev;
        void *vaddr = obj->phys_handle->vaddr + args->offset;
        char __user *user_data = u64_to_user_ptr(args->data_ptr);
-       int ret;
 
        /* We manually control the domain here and pretend that it
         * remains coherent i.e. in the GTT domain, like shmem_pwrite.
         */
-       lockdep_assert_held(&obj->base.dev->struct_mutex);
-       ret = i915_gem_object_wait(obj,
-                                  I915_WAIT_INTERRUPTIBLE |
-                                  I915_WAIT_LOCKED |
-                                  I915_WAIT_ALL,
-                                  MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT,
-                                  to_rps_client(file));
-       if (ret)
-               return ret;
-
        intel_fb_obj_invalidate(obj, ORIGIN_CPU);
-       if (__copy_from_user_inatomic_nocache(vaddr, user_data, args->size)) {
-               unsigned long unwritten;
-
-               /* The physical object once assigned is fixed for the lifetime
-                * of the obj, so we can safely drop the lock and continue
-                * to access vaddr.
-                */
-               mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-               unwritten = copy_from_user(vaddr, user_data, args->size);
-               mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-               if (unwritten) {
-                       ret = -EFAULT;
-                       goto out;
-               }
-       }
+       if (copy_from_user(vaddr, user_data, args->size))
+               return -EFAULT;
 
        drm_clflush_virt_range(vaddr, args->size);
-       i915_gem_chipset_flush(to_i915(dev));
+       i915_gem_chipset_flush(to_i915(obj->base.dev));
 
-out:
        intel_fb_obj_flush(obj, false, ORIGIN_CPU);
-       return ret;
+       return 0;
 }
 
 void *i915_gem_object_alloc(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to