On Thu, 10 May 2012 15:39:32 -0700, Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> wrote: > I'm not opposed to this change, but it would have probably been better > to not remove the BUG_ONs.
I actually removed them because in order to satisfy them we have to initialise rings we never use (and have another patch so that we only intialise rings once inside intel_ringbuffer.c). We were causing extra work for ourselves for no good reason. And we need to cull the BUG_ONs for which a WARN and recovery would serve better. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx