On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:29:18 -0400, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 23:13 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:43:50 -0400, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > These were just working around the math being wrong. > > > > One wonders whether this might break some machines which are currently > > working. Should we emit an error or something if an eDP panel asks for > > the impossible? > > Probably, but I think in cases where that happens we should be > considering the driver to be broken before the panel. No one's going to > manufacture hardware that can't run Windows.
Sigh, This patch did introduce a number of regressions, notably https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45801 -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
