On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:28:52PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Op 15-12-16 om 16:23 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 04:17:45PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> >> Op 12-12-16 om 21:35 schreef ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com:
> >>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> Add a test to try out all the different plane enable/disable
> >>> order permutations.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
> >> Didn't look through the test, but sounds like
> >>
> >> kms_atomic_transitions.plane-*-transition-* ?
> >>
> >> Although that one tests a few more edge cases like modeset disable and 
> >> nonblocking updates..
> > I don't immediately see where it would try all the permutations, nor can
> > I see any crc_nonblock() stuff so doesn't seem like it could even spot
> > transient errors.
> >
> I haven't done any crc test there yet, but the double loop in 
> run_transition_test handles all combinations of planes.

permutations > combinations

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to