Em Ter, 2016-12-13 às 17:57 -0200, Paulo Zanoni escreveu: > BSpec got updated and this workaround is now listed as standard > required programming for all subsequent projects. >
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 5 ++--- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > index efc0e74..b1c8897 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c > @@ -55,10 +55,9 @@ int i915_gem_stolen_insert_node_in_range(struct > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > return -ENODEV; > > /* See the comment at the drm_mm_init() call for more about > this check. > - * WaSkipStolenMemoryFirstPage:bdw,chv,kbl (incomplete) > + * WaSkipStolenMemoryFirstPage:bdw+ (incomplete) > */ > - if (start < 4096 && (IS_GEN8(dev_priv) || > - IS_KBL_REVID(dev_priv, 0, > KBL_REVID_A0))) > + if (start < 4096 && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) > start = 4096; > > mutex_lock(&dev_priv->mm.stolen_lock); _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
