On 07/12/2016 13:58, Chris Wilson wrote:
Second retroactive test, make sure that the waiters are removed from the
global wait-tree when their seqno completes.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index c768608974e1..fc950f7ff322 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -705,6 +705,12 @@ static struct intel_engine_cs *mock_engine(const char 
*name)
        return engine;
 }

+static void mock_seqno_advance(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, u32 seqno)
+{
+       intel_write_status_page(engine, I915_GEM_HWS_INDEX, seqno);
+       intel_engine_wakeup(engine);
+}
+
 static int *get_random_order(int count)
 {
        int *order;
@@ -766,6 +772,27 @@ static int check_rbtree(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
        return 0;
 }

+static int check_completion(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
+                           const unsigned long *bitmap,
+                           const struct intel_wait *waiters,
+                           const int count)
+{
+       int n;
+
+       for (n = 0; n < count; n++) {
+               if (intel_wait_complete(&waiters[n]) != !!test_bit(n, bitmap))
+                       continue;
+
+               pr_err("waiter[%d, seqno=%d] is %s, but expected %s\n",
+                      n, waiters[n].seqno,
+                      intel_wait_complete(&waiters[n]) ? "complete" : "active",
+                      test_bit(n, bitmap) ? "active" : "complete");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
 static int check_rbtree_empty(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
        struct intel_breadcrumbs *b = &engine->breadcrumbs;
@@ -857,10 +884,93 @@ static int igt_random_insert_remove(void *ignore)
        return err;
 }

+static int igt_insert_complete(void *ignore)
+{
+       struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
+       struct intel_wait *waiters;
+       const int count = 4096;
+       unsigned long *bitmap;
+       int err = -ENOMEM;
+       int n, m;
+
+       engine = mock_engine("mock");
+       if (!engine)
+               goto out;
+
+       waiters = drm_malloc_gfp(count, sizeof(*waiters), GFP_TEMPORARY);
+       if (!waiters)
+               goto out_engines;
+
+       bitmap = kcalloc(DIV_ROUND_UP(count, BITS_PER_LONG), sizeof(*bitmap),
+                        GFP_TEMPORARY);
+       if (!bitmap)
+               goto out_waiters;
+
+       for (n = 0; n < count; n++) {
+               intel_wait_init(&waiters[n], n + 0x1000);

Maybe const int seqno_start = 0x1000 since there are multiple users.

+               intel_engine_add_wait(engine, &waiters[n]);
+               __set_bit(n, bitmap);
+       }
+       err = check_rbtree(engine, bitmap, waiters, count);
+       if (err)
+               goto err;
+
+       for (n = 0; n < count; n = m) {
+               int seqno = 2 * n;
+
+               GEM_BUG_ON(find_first_bit(bitmap, count) != n);
+
+               if (intel_wait_complete(&waiters[n])) {
+                       pr_err("waiter[%d, seqno=%d] completed too early\n",
+                              n, waiters[n].seqno);
+                       err = -EINVAL;
+                       goto err;
+               }
+
+               /* complete the following waiters */
+               mock_seqno_advance(engine, seqno + 0x1000);
+               for (m = n; m <= seqno; m++) {
+                       if (m == count)
+                               break;
+
+                       GEM_BUG_ON(!test_bit(m, bitmap));
+                       __clear_bit(m, bitmap);
+               }
+
+               intel_engine_remove_wait(engine, &waiters[n]);
+               RB_CLEAR_NODE(&waiters[n].node);
+
+               err = check_rbtree(engine, bitmap, waiters, count);
+               if (err) {
+                       pr_err("rbtree corrupt after seqno advance to %d\n",
+                              seqno + 0x1000);
+                       goto err;
+               }
+
+               err = check_completion(engine, bitmap, waiters, count);
+               if (err) {
+                       pr_err("completions after seqno advance to %d failed\n",
+                              seqno + 0x1000);
+                       goto err;
+               }
+       }
+
+       err = check_rbtree_empty(engine);
+err:
+       kfree(bitmap);
+out_waiters:
+       drm_free_large(waiters);
+out_engines:
+       kfree(engine);
+out:
+       return err;
+}
+
 int intel_breadcrumbs_selftest(void)
 {
        static const struct i915_subtest tests[] = {
                SUBTEST(igt_random_insert_remove),
+               SUBTEST(igt_insert_complete),
        };

        return i915_subtests(tests, NULL);


Looks OK.

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to