On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:21:07 -0300
Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodo...@intel.com> wrote:

> Avoid bogus asserts on Lynx Point.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodo...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |   10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 8308da0..ca0edbf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -917,6 +917,11 @@ static void assert_pch_pll(struct drm_i915_private 
> *dev_priv,
>       u32 val;
>       bool cur_state;
>  
> +     if (HAS_PCH_LPT(dev_priv->dev)) {
> +             DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("LPT detected: skipping PCH PLL test\n");
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
>       if (!intel_crtc->pch_pll) {
>               WARN(1, "asserting PCH PLL enabled with no PLL\n");
>               return;
> @@ -1102,6 +1107,11 @@ static void assert_pch_refclk_enabled(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>       u32 val;
>       bool enabled;
>  
> +     if (HAS_PCH_LPT(dev_priv->dev)) {
> +             DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("LPT does not has PCH refclk, skipping 
> check\n");
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
>       val = I915_READ(PCH_DREF_CONTROL);
>       enabled = !!(val & (DREF_SSC_SOURCE_MASK | DREF_NONSPREAD_SOURCE_MASK |
>                           DREF_SUPERSPREAD_SOURCE_MASK));

Hm this makes me think we might want separate crtc enable/disable
functions for HSW instead, when combined with a couple of the other
checks.

Up to you...

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to