On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 06:57:01AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 06:03:48PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> >  static int drm_dp_init_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> >                         struct drm_dp_vcpi *vcpi, int pbn)
> >  {
> > -   int num_slots;
> > +   int req_slots;
> >     int ret;
> >  
> > -   num_slots = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn, mgr->pbn_div);
> > +   req_slots = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn, mgr->pbn_div);
> >  
> > -   if (num_slots > mgr->avail_slots)
> > -           return -ENOSPC;
> > +   mutex_lock(&mgr->lock);
> > +   if (req_slots > mgr->avail_slots) {
> > +           ret = -ENOSPC;
> > +           goto out;
> > +   }
> 
> You are not atomically reducing the mgr->avail_slots, leading to
> possible overallocation of multiple streams?

Yup, see my lenghty reply to patch 1 for what needs to be done here to fix
this correctly.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to