On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:36:12PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> On 16/11/2016 12:26, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >We don't spam the debug when we create a normal object, nor when we
> >allocate their pages. Yet we do for stolen objects, and since these are
> >quite frequently used (at least once per context), the resulting spam
> >floods the dmesg in CI.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> >---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> >b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> >index 981796d7618c..55491234beda 100644
> >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> >@@ -523,7 +523,6 @@ i915_pages_create_for_stolen(struct drm_device *dev,
> > struct sg_table *st;
> > struct scatterlist *sg;
> >
> >- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("offset=0x%x, size=%d\n", offset, size);
> > GEM_BUG_ON(offset > dev_priv->ggtt.stolen_size - size);
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
Minor hiccup in this patch as my base had slightly drifted, oops.
Pushed the line removals anyway! :)
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
