On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:40:45PM +0200, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Evaluate GEM_BUG_ON expression similar to actual BUG_ON even if
> DEBUG_GEM is disabled.
>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
> index 51ec793..d141676 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.h
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
> #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM
> #define GEM_BUG_ON(expr) BUG_ON(expr)
> #else
> -#define GEM_BUG_ON(expr) do { } while (0)
> +#define GEM_BUG_ON(expr) do { if (expr) {} } while(0)
> #endif
Mentioned on irc, that I'm not that keen on having the side-effects
around. Suggestion was while (0) do { if (expr) {} } while (0)
But spot the dev who touched gem code without enabling the debug :-p
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
