On 04/11/2016 15:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 02:44:44PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

On 03/11/2016 11:55, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 11:03:47AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

On 02/11/2016 17:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
+struct i915_dependency {
+       struct i915_priotree *signal;
+       struct list_head pre_link, post_link;
+       unsigned long flags;
+#define I915_DEPENDENCY_ALLOC BIT(0)
+};
+
+struct i915_priotree {
+       struct list_head pre_list; /* who is before us, we depend upon */
+       struct list_head post_list; /* who is after us, they depend upon us */
+};

I need a picture to imagine this data structure. :(

The names suck.

When you wrote this I assumed you would respin shortly with some
better names?

Not yet. I kind of like

struct i915_dependency {
        struct i915_priotree *signaler;
        struct list_head signaler_link;
        struct list_head listener_link;
};

struct i915_priotree {
        struct list_head signalers_list; /* before us, we depend on them */
        struct list_head listeners_list; /* those after, who depend on us */
};


What is the signaler in i915_dependency?

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to