On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:20:51AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:09:26AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > > > On 26/10/2016 07:32, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 03:02:33PM +0000, Paneri, Praveen wrote: > > >>> So when you say that all Y tiling tests fail without this kernel hack, > > >>> which tests you are referring to? > > >> If I revert this IGT patch and do not make below kernel change, > > >> kms_draw_crc (ytiled cases, last patch in this series) fail with > > >> following error. > > >> > > >> Test assertion failure function igt_assert_crc_equal, file > > >> hardware/intel/intel-gpu-tools/lib/igt_debugfs.c:266: > > >> Failed assertion: a->crc[i] == b->crc[i] > > >> error: 0x68c96b8b != 0x948e53b > > >> > > >> I think, I shall debug it further and try to fix it without making this > > >> change. > > > > > > Can't we just set the fb modifiers when creating the drm_fb in the igt > > > helpers? > > > > Thats already there, if I understand what you mean. But it only does the > > modifer and does not set the object tiling. So I suspect this test might > > be depending on object tiling being set as well? In which case we may > > be missing the capability to create the object separately from the fb > > creation, because otherwise it is too late to try to change the object > > tiling. > > I'm pretty sure I had patches to split the two apart. Assuming I never > posted them, they must be on a branch... somewhere.
Failed to find them. So someone will have to reimplement if needed. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
