On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 06:52:13PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ke, 2016-09-14 at 07:52 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > @@ -315,17 +304,42 @@ submit_notify(struct i915_sw_fence *fence, enum
> > i915_sw_fence_notify state)
> > {
> > struct drm_i915_gem_request *request =
> > container_of(fence, typeof(*request), submit);
> > + struct intel_timeline *timeline;
> > + struct intel_engine_cs *engine = request->engine;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + u32 seqno;
> >
> > /* Will be called from irq-context when using foreign DMA fences */
> >
> > - switch (state) {
> > - case FENCE_COMPLETE:
> > - request->engine->submit_request(request);
> > - break;
> > + if (state != FENCE_COMPLETE)
> > + return NOTIFY_DONE;
> >
> > - case FENCE_FREE:
> > - break;
> > - }
> > + timeline = engine->timeline;
> > + GEM_BUG_ON(timeline == request->timeline);
>
> Umm, why this BUG_ON?
To document that the intent here is to move from the per-context
timeline onto the global per-engine timeline. If the request was already
on the engine->timeline bad things would happen, at the very simplest a
deadlock here.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
