On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 09:45:40 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > int > i915_gem_init_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > struct drm_file *file) > @@ -155,7 +136,8 @@ i915_gem_init_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > return -EINVAL; > > mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex); > - i915_gem_do_init(dev, args->gtt_start, args->gtt_end, args->gtt_end); > + i915_gem_init_global_gtt(dev, args->gtt_start, > + args->gtt_end, args->gtt_end); > mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex); > > return 0;
This raises the interesting question of ppgtt interacting with DRI1, a never supported combination. Do we start making that expressly clear with a few if (HAS_ALIASING_PPGTT()) return -ENODEV; or even if (gen >= 6) return -ENODEV; ? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
