On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:55:56 -0800 Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:09:15 +0100, Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> wrote: > > Extend the flag parameter to support the context id (from the create > > IOCTL) so that userspace can associate a context with the batchbuffer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> > > > /** Resets the SO write offset registers for transform feedback on gen7. */ > > #define I915_EXEC_GEN7_SOL_RESET (1<<8) > > +#define I915_EXEC_CONTEXT_MASK (((1<<22)-1) << 9) > > Instead of stuffing a context id into a subset of flags, could we just > use a uint32_t context id in half of rsvd1? Yeah, having over 1 << 22 > contexts is crazy, but this just seems to eat up all the rest of the > flags for no reason and then we'll have to carve out of rsvd1 for the > next flag. Sure. I didn't know if rsvd fields were allowed to be used, and I was too lazy to check libdrm history to see if they'd always been zero'd out. So yes, I will update this. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
