On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:28:36 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > Half of the users actually don't want just no tracing, but need to > avoid the forcewake dance for correctness. So add new variants > __I915_READ and __I915_WRITE for that.
I'd sure like something more descriptive than '__' here. Perhaps I915_READ_NOWAKE? Or even I915_READ_NO_FORCEWAKE? -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpueytVUJIzW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
