On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:09:36PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> We're going to assume that EDID is more reliable than the VBT tables
> for eDP panels, which is notably true on MacBook machines where the
> VBT contains completely bogus data.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com>
Ok, this is way over my head, just checked whether the patch does what it
claims to - nice exercise in reading dp modeset code ;-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: dan...@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to