On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:00:14 -0400, Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote:

> This code is still present in Linus' tree, and still crap.  Any
> reviewers for this series?

It all looks reasonable to me, and Chris reviewed or ack'd every patch
but #4, which looks reasonable on the surface to me.

Are you thinking this should land in 3.1? Or 3.2?

-- 
keith.pack...@intel.com

Attachment: pgpfrHOfsYXJC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to