On Sep 7, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Andrew Lutomirski <l...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> wrote: >> While I think the previous code is correct, it was hard to follow and >> hard to debug. Since we already have a ring abstraction, might as well >> use it to handle the semaphore updates and compares. >> >> I don't expect this code to make semaphores better or worse, but you >> never know... >> >> Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> >> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> >> Cc: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 3 +- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 7 + >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 176 >> +++++++++++++++++++++------- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 7 +- >> 4 files changed, 145 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) >> > > Sadly, it still instantly crashes. > > --Andy Remind me again... Does ssh still work? _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
