On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:52:42 -0700 Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> While I think the previous code is correct, it was hard to follow and > hard to debug. Since we already have a ring abstraction, might as well > use it to handle the semaphore updates and compares. > > I don't expect this code to make semaphores better or worse, but you > never know... > > Cc: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> > Cc: Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> I just realized I forgot to use the new invalid #define in the code. I'll resubmit that tomorrow. Ben _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
