On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 02:21:24 -0700 Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:12:25 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> > wrote: > > > I'd like to amend my reviewed by and say the lock shouldn't be held > > around the call to the drm helper function. It queues some work that > > also takes the mode config lock, which will break. So you can drop it > > before that... Previously I had only checked our internal driver > > callbacks but missed that the lock was held across the helper too. > > So the work may get executed immediately rather than being run later at > some point? It sure looks that way... but I don't remember any rule about work queue items having inter dependencies like this. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
