On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:49:36 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> The patch closes a race condition. The essence of your complaint is that > the kernel is not as fast as we need it to be, and that the initial upload > to any object is slower than expected. I presume you also have a plan for > fixing the underwhelming performance of a glibc memcpy through an > established GTT mapping? I see a performance regression in a critical path for most applications (texture upload), and I'm not seeing any bug report that your fix closes. That seems pretty conclusive to me; I'll plan on pushing a revert of this patch to eliminate the regression from the previous version. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpHioRaYH2le.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
