On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:08:59 -0700, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:39:06 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > wrote: > > For the record, on my SugarBay, this patch on top of drm-intel-fixes and > > mesa.git + your instruction streaming, regresses cairo-xlib 4.5s to 4.7s > > (4%, with a claim of .1% stddev) and improves cairo-gl from 21.5s to 20.1s > > (6.5%, with a claim of .5% stddev) for the firefox-talos-gfx. [This is a > > system that can do under 2s for cairo-xlib using vmap and the perf > > patches I posted before.] > > -Chris > > I was testing with semaphores enabled on the LLC series. I'm curious > how this revert could possibly regress cairo-xlib, though -- that seems > very strange.
Moving back to LLC+semaphores (2.6.39-rc2+), firefox-talos-gfx: xlib: 4.473 gl: 20.753 applying the patch: xlib: 4.472 gl: 20.824 I'm just not reproducing the same issue you are seeing. Are you using a standard distro Kconfig, or if not, can you send me yours? -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
