On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:07:41 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
wrote:
> The old overlay block has all sorts of quirks and is very different than
> ILK+ video sprites. So rename it to legacy to make that clear and clash
> less with core overlay support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
> ---
> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ struct drm_i915_error_state {
> u32 cache_level:2;
> } *active_bo, *pinned_bo;
> u32 active_bo_count, pinned_bo_count;
> - struct intel_overlay_error_state *overlay;
> + struct intel_legacy_overlay_error_state *overlay;
We need to change the name here as well, unless you have some
differently name error struct up your sleeve.
struct intel_sprite_error_state?
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 3cfc391..d73e622 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ struct intel_crtc {
> bool busy; /* is scanout buffer being updated frequently? */
> struct timer_list idle_timer;
> bool lowfreq_avail;
> - struct intel_overlay *overlay;
> + struct intel_legacy_overlay *overlay;
> struct intel_unpin_work *unpin_work;
> int fdi_lanes;
And here. Give the old code longer names, we don't want to be touching
it ever again. ;-)
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
