On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 16:48:30 -0400 Adam Jackson <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 6/1/11 4:44 PM, Florian Mickler wrote: > > I think using horizontal spanning as a default is a good idea. > > > > Also bringing all outputs up in their preferred mode could be the right > > move. > > > > [That commit in question wouldn't help my case, since I have a "Right Of" > > in the > > xorg.conf and thus it would use a different code-path (right now).] > > Oh, sure, I see what you're saying. > > > When there is no preferred mode, xf86ClosestMode (probably enhanced to > > respect horizontal or vertical relation in some form) would still be > > needed... choosing of mode and positioning of outputs > > relative to each other should probably be decoupled... > > Probably. But in your case, why would you not just pick the preferred > mode for all outputs, rather than contorting to try to pick modes with > the same height? > > - ajax Well... because the endeffect is the same in my case. :) But yes, if there is a preferred mode, that should be used. Is there a preferred mode in all cases? Regards, Flo _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
