On Thu, 12 May 2011 17:34:49 -0700, Keith Packard <kei...@keithp.com> wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2011 22:17:14 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > wrote: > > The computation of the first-level watermarks for g4x and gen5+ are > > based on the same algorithm, so we can refactor those code paths to > > use a single function. > > g4x_compute_wm0 takes a plane. ironlake_compute_wm0 takes a pipe. The > change implicitly assumes that pipe == plane on ironlake. Please clarify?
We lucked out. It should have been a plane on Ironlake as well. Fortunately on ILK+ each pipe is slaved to one (identically numbered) plane. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
