On Wed, 04 May 2011 20:40:37 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> We can remove dpms_mode in favour of solely using active. That sounds like a good plan. And what about the intel_dp->dpms_mode value? Should it be switched to a simple 'active' boolean as well? Or is the existing crtc->active value sufficient? -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgpjaz2ZjvBYS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
