On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:53:14 -0700, Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> wrote: > > Once you're done laughing that I got up to v5 (I think I skipped a v3, > and v1 was the IOCTls, so it's really more like a v3) for patches meant > to simply allow register reads and wites... > > Back to struct_mutex since it turned out to be my mistake regarding the > IIR problem. The only issue in the interrupt handler was rps, which has > been moved to a workqueue. > > Struct_mutex must be held to forcewake, or relinquish forcwake.
Ok, I got to the end. I feel really squeamish that our register read/write routines are getting seriously overcomplicated for interrupt work and would like a cut down version for IRQ context. But other than that and some silly code that needs to be improved in light of your review, it's looking good. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
