On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:55:10 +0100, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> I'll spin up a patch for a temporary buffer and see what you think. Ok. I'd love to be able to use that code path all of the time, but I don't like the thought of the cost of a temporary allocation every time you do load detection. -- keith.pack...@intel.com
pgptX1TbfuxdV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
