On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 08:54:44 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> wrote: > I like it (though now the comment talks about DSPADDR and leaves > DSPSURF out in the cold).
D'oh. That'll teach me to try and write a comment to explain a function first! > Sounds like our dpms code may be causing trouble for this x11perf run > perhaps? What else would cause us to change base addrs during a bench > run like that? Right. The early observation is that we don't assign a framebuffer to the CRTC borrowed for VGA/TV load detection. And I can postulate that we contrived to access a PTE during a hotplug poll whilst rewriting the GTT (or something similar to the object following the ringbuffer). I think we can just attach the fbcon for the purposes of load detection. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
