On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:27:18 -0500 (CDT), Mike Isely <is...@isely.net> wrote: > > Keep in mind that if the probe action is returning wrong results, that's > > worse than no results. This isn't a question about "supplying missing > > data" so much as it a case of "overriding bad data". Without that fixed > > mode disabling ability, it is very possible that the panel will simply > > be set up wrong with a corrupted display, with no possible means for the > > user to repair the problem. That's what led me to make the change, and > > that same change had been living peacefully in the userspace xorg > > driver, up until the point that UMS had been removed from it. Right now > > without the ability to disable fixed mode there simply *is no* > > workaround. > > Point taken. If we can't get a resolution on i915.lvds_fixed_mode= within > the next week, let's focus on the workaround instead. > -Chris
Sounds good. The remaining updated patches look good as well. -Mike is...@pobox.com is...@isely.net -- Mike Isely isely @ isely (dot) net PGP: 03 54 43 4D 75 E5 CC 92 71 16 01 E2 B5 F5 C1 E8 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
