On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:06:23 +1000 > Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> >> wrote: >> > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:18:44 +1000, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> This commit breaks the eDP panel on the my HP Elitebook 2540p, >> >> reverting it brings the panel back to life. >> > >> > Happy to test the revert just as soon as I work out what the equivalent >> > commit is in my tree... ;-) >> > -Chris >> >> oops >> >> 869184a675662bddcdf76c5b95665272facff2b8 >> >> must have sent the revert commit id locally or something ;-) >> >> drm/i915/dp: use VBT provided eDP params if available >> >> Looks like trusting the BIOS is a bad plan, also that commit seems to >> do a lot more than just use some VBT values, probably needs more >> splitting up from jbarnes. > > !...@!! > > One day we'll have reliable eDP mode setting, I promise. Time to > harass some more people internally about how to get sane values and > whether skipping training is generally safe (assuming we use the right > values that is!).
I suspect you should split that patch also, it did two things, and I wasn't sure which one way the one I wanted. Dave. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
