On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Eric Anholt <e...@anholt.net> wrote: > For whatever libdrm knock-it-off-with-the-overallocation patch we settle > on, it's going to trigger the bug with the 2D driver underallocating > framebuffer memory on my 1440x900 laptop. I've pushed tested patches to > both branches, and my plan is to roll point releases of those, and > mention in the libdrm release notes whenever that happens that you'll > want either 2.9.2, 2.10.1, 2.11, or > d08782e1a17279092fa4027d98d25ef36a9f80e5 in your 2D driver. The > alternative would be for libdrm to avoid good behavior unless the driver > said it was ready to cope, but that seems messy when the fix is so > trivial.
Uggh, you've heard of ABIs? I'd rather we maintained them if we could. People don't just update libdrm because of Intel, so they might be grabbing a new libdrm to work on some other driver, and not realise their distro needs newer ones. Dave. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
