On Fri, 28 May 2010 19:55:24 +1000 Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 01:02:08PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> This fixes a regression in the copy fb code we use to get seamless > >> startup on Fedora/RHEL, without this fix, we block forever in the wait > >> when starting X. > > > > I've just checked latest -linus and found in include/drm/drm_os_linux.h: > > > > #define DRM_WAKEUP( queue ) wake_up( queue ) > > > > It's been like that since I've originally wrote the uninterruptible sleep > > stuff for the intel overlay code (I've checked way back then to make sure > > it doesn't hang). Care to explain how this fixes a regression? > > > > doh, you fixed that in the patch, and for some reason we don't have > that in our Fedora or RHEL backports wierd. > > Ignore this. > > I don't remember much discussion on changing drm_os_linux, but it > should have been fine. We should still kill the drm_os_linux bits where possible... -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
