If the FBC is already disabled, then we do not even attempt to disable FBC and so there is no point emitting a debug statement at that point, having already emitted one saying why we are disabling FBC.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index 1845a06..e504fdb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -1248,10 +1248,11 @@ static void intel_update_fbc(struct drm_crtc *crtc, return; out_disable: - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("unsupported config, disabling FBC\n"); /* Multiple disables should be harmless */ - if (intel_fbc_enabled(dev)) + if (intel_fbc_enabled(dev)) { + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("unsupported config, disabling FBC\n"); intel_disable_fbc(dev); + } } static int -- 1.7.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx