Hi there all, A few of us (Andrew Alston, Éric Vyncke, Suresh Krishnan, Donald Eastlake and myself) have been working on a mechanism to make "limited domains" protocols safe(r) to deploy.
The 50,000ft [0] view is that fail-closed domains are inherently easier to protect than fail-open, and so the document provides some mechanisms which protocol designers can use to achieve this when designing new protocols. We'd really like some review and feedback: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wkumari-intarea-safe-limited-domains/ What do you think of the approach? What do you think of the document? Is it clear and understandable? Does it help solve the issue(s)? etc… W [0]: AKA 15.24km for those who weird folk who enjoy complicating their lives by counting in tens instead of furlongs or shackles or shaftments or other simple systems like that.
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list -- int-area@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to int-area-le...@ietf.org
