What about taking advantage of the ICMP error mechanism? >From Phone ________________________________ From: Int-area <int-area-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Florian Obser <florian+i...@narrans.de> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2023 8:15:21 AM To: Luigi IANNONE <luigi.iannone=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org> Cc: i...@ietf.org <i...@ietf.org>; int-area@ietf.org <int-area@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Int-area] [IPv6] New Draft - ICMPv6 Loopback
[EXTERNAL SENDER: This email originated from outside of Stratus Technologies. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.] On 2023-06-07 11:42 UTC, Luigi IANNONE <luigi.iannone=40huawei....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > For FreeBSD it looks like code MUST be 0 or the packet is dropped: > this is coming from KAME so everything that derives from there has this. E.g. it's also present in OpenBSD & NetBSD. > (file netinet6/icmp6.c line 550: > http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/netinet6/icmp6.c#L550<http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/netinet6/icmp6.c#L550>) > > > case ICMP6_ECHO_REQUEST: > icmp6_ifstat_inc(ifp, ifs6_in_echo); > if (code != 0) > goto badcode; > > > Ciao > > L. -- In my defence, I have been left unsupervised. _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
