I support adoption. This is the equivalent for what RFC 5858 did for ROHC, and is clearly needed to enable the use of SCHC in environments that can benefit from it.
Grüße, Carsten > On 2022-09-14, at 04:15, Wassim Haddad > <wassim.haddad=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Dear IntArea WG, > > We are starting a 2-week call for adoption of “Internet Protocol Number for > SCHC” draft: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-moskowitz-intarea-schc-ip-protocol-number/01/ > > If you have an opinion on whether this document should be adopted by the > IntArea WG please indicate it on the WG mailing list by end of Wednesday, > September 28th. > > > Thanks, > > Wassim & Juan-Carlos > (IntArea WG chairs) > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > Int-area@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
