Thanks Tom!

Wow is that buried...  (IMHO)

The values seem to be all over the place.  Any insight as to why this is?

Bob

On 9/8/22 11:55, tom petch wrote:
From: Int-area <int-area-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Robert Moskowitz 
<rgm-i...@htt-consult.com>
Sent: 08 September 2022 14:03
On 9/8/22 08:31, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote:
Hello Joel:

SCHC could be used to compress IP option headers and the residue be stored in a 
SCHC option, which a next header points at uncompressed transport (e.g., 
encrypted, uncompressible).
Additionally, finding the SCHC context may require metadata that could also be 
found in a SCHC option. Over one hop in LPWAN that is all implicit but over IP 
it might not be.

SCHC is layered depending on which endpoint talks to which. E.g., you compress 
a tunnel with inner that is already SCHC-compressed, you do security, etc...
So you could have SCHC options one after the other. We have not defined the 
option yet, LPWAN is discussing recharter to cover SCHC applied beyond LPWANs.

But since we're at it, let's do both in one RFC.
Note that we'll also need a value for IPv6-Compression-Protocol Types, see 
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-thubert-intarea-schc-over-ppp-03.html#name-iana-considerations.

I cannot find this IANA registry.  Can someone please provide the URL.

Perhaps
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ppp-numbers/ppp-numbers.xhtml#ppp-numbers-29

IP-Compression-Protocol Types in the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Field 
Assignments  Group on the IANA website as set up by RFC1332.

Tom Petch

And this is why I have been instructed, and have adhered to, including
IANA URLs as informative references in my drafts.

Like in draft-moskowitz-intarea-schc-ip-protocol-number!

Bob

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to